Polls

How will the Badgers do in the Big Ten Tourney?
 

Interesting Articles

Basic Instructions

Matt's Site Feed
RSS 1.0
ATOM 0.3

"If they give you ruled paper, write the other way."

-- Juan Ramon Jiminez 

 

What's for Dinner?

2/4 Sauted cod with red lentil dal

2/2/10 Stir fried beef with broccoli, onions, and peppers

1/31/10 Coq au Vin

1/5/09 Roast lamb with burnt onions

11/17 Salmon with button fries and salad

11/13 Sauted chicken with boiled potatoes and spinach

9/1 Grilled chicken thighs in white yogurt sauce and vegetables


7/15 Pork chops & grilled vegetables 

7/14 Ribeye with mushrooms & a salad 

7/13 Baby back ribs

7/7 Grilled chicken breasts with pasta and salad

6/17 Skate with Capers

Home
Raw Milk in Wisconsin
User Rating: / 1
Thursday, 11 March 2010

Wisconsin is currently considering lifting the ban on “raw,” a.k.a. unpasturized, milk.  I am for it.

It’s unlikely that I will have raw milk more than once, just to try it, but I like the idea in theory.  I am more interested in raw milk cheese production in the state.

We had a farm outside of Appleton, Mossholder’s, that made its own brick cheese out of raw milk.  It was a very good cheese that they made in the basement of their house from the milk of their cows.  It was always fun going there, seeing the cheese in various states of production, and getting samples.

At one point they had to stop selling their mild brick because of a regulation that cheeses aged less than sixty days had to be made with pasteurized milk.  II remember old lady Mossholder telling us that they weren’t going to start pasteurizing their milk.

That’s an FDA regulation, though, and Wisconsin’s law won’t change that.  However, if states start selling raw milk to consumers, can raw milk cheeses be far behind?

On another farming note, Peter Seely, the owner of our CSA, was interviewed on Milwaukee Public Radio, WUWM, this morning.  Listen or read it here.

Comments (1) | Add as favourites (1) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 10 | E-mail

Last Updated ( Thursday, 11 March 2010 )
 
AT&T versus Time Warner
User Rating: / 0
Friday, 05 March 2010

We switched our cable service from Time Warner to AT&T U-Verse.  We did not change because AT&T convinced us that their service was better, but only because Time Warner could not fix the problem we were having: we could only record programs intermittently.

The details are unimportant, but we had Time Warner out no fewer than 6 times and they replaced everything several times.  They could never fix the problem.  The people at Time Warner were professional and courteous, but, in the long run, ineffective.

Switching meant work so we resisted.  But finally we had enough and, as Popeye says, “enough is too much.”

AT&T came to install the service within a week.  The installation process took about four hours for two televisions and the computer.  The cost for the comparable AT&T package with phone to Time Warner is virtually identical, except that we get about a $600 discount for committing to a year.  Not bad.

We’ve only be on the new system for a week, but some advantages I see with AT & T:

  • Free Wifi, installed
  • Simpler controls
  • 4 incoming streams instead of two (it’s come up. Really)
  • Ability to program to record from any computer on the 'net

Some things that are worse

  • More hardware (4 vs. 1 piece)
  • Not all channels are available (e.g., some of the PBS channels)

Overall, I like AT&T better.  Would I have switched had we not been having those issues?  Hard to say.

The biggest benefit, though, is it works.

Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (2) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 10 | E-mail

Last Updated ( Friday, 05 March 2010 )
 
That Was Easy!
User Rating: / 0
Thursday, 04 March 2010

Last Sunday I switched on the television to watch the Olympic hockey finals.  The last thing we had watched was a movie on Saturday night so the TV was still set on “DVD” mode.

We have a Samsung, 37” LCD and the control to change the input source is labeled “Source.”  I hit the button and nothing happened.  I tried a few other buttons and they seemed to work.  I tried the “Source” button on the TV and that worked.  Again I tried the remote button, no luck.  That was the only button that wasn’t working.

I logged on to the Samsung site and logged into their technical chat.  Remember this was a Sunday, about 1:30PM.

“Wayne” asked me a few questions, has me try a few things, then asks if I had a copy of my receipt.  I did not have one handy, and he told me that he needed a copy before he could honor the warranty.

I bought the unit through, who else, Amazon.com.  On their website I went into my order history, got the receipt, downloaded to a jpeg file with Picasa, and emailed it to Wayne.

Thirty seconds later he had it and said that he’d send me a new remote.

How’s that for ameliorating what could have been a hassle?

Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (3) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 9 | E-mail

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 4 of 395